23. Đánh giá hiệu quả hệ Outrigger trong kiểm soát co ngắn không đều dưới tải trọng gió kết cấu bê tông nhà cao tầng
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61591/jslhu.25.785Keywords:
Slab reinforcement, TCVN 5574:2023, ETABS, structural designAbstract
This paper presents a comparative study between the calculation of reinforced concrete slab reinforcement using the moment coefficient method in accordance with TCVN 5574:2023 and the structural analysis results obtained from ETABS software. Through a representative case study, internal forces, required reinforcement areas, and reinforcement distribution are compared to evaluate discrepancies and the applicability of each approach in practical design. The results indicate that the moment coefficient method has several limitations, while ETABS provides more comprehensive analysis results by accounting for various influencing factors, thus enabling a more optimal and safer reinforcement design for slabs
References
Smith, B. S. và Coull, A. (1991). Tall Building Structures: Analysis and Design. John Wiley & Sons.
Young, K. K. và Taranath, B. S. (2016). Structural Analysis and Design of Tall Buildings: Steel and Composite Construction. CRC Press.
Kim, J. và Lee, D. (2010). Seismic performance of outrigger structures in tall buildings. Engineering Structures, 32(2), 377–385.
Zhou, M., Wang, Y. và Lu, Y. (2021). Effect of outrigger and belt truss on the performance of high-rise buildings under lateral loads. Structures, 33, 2952–2964.
Lee, C. H. và Kim, J. (2013). Investigation on the differential column shortening in high-rise buildings with outrigger systems. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 86, 104–112.
Bộ Xây dựng (2022), TCVN 1997:2022 – Tải trọng và tác động – Tiêu chuẩn thiết kế, Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Xây dựng.
