Teachers’ feedback on learners’ writing: The case of People’s Police College II

Authors

  • Nguyễn Thị Trang 155 Nguyen Van Tang street, Long Thanh My ward, Thu Duc city, HCMC, Vietnam
  • Lê Phương Long Lac Hong University, No. 10 Huynh Van Nghe, Buu Long Ward, Bien Hoa City, Dong Nai Province, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61591/jslhu.16.374

Keywords:

Feedback, Errors, mistakes, Error correction, Error analysis, People's Police College II

Abstract

Feedback refers to remarks or feedback on a problem that has recently been identified through careful observation and attentive listening expressing individual viewpoints, appreciating commendable qualities, and offering suggestions to correct weaknesses. In this study, the authors surveyed the types of errors in 100 short paragraphs written by 100 students who are studying English in 100 classes - Police Officers of Administrative Management on Social Order (QLHC1, QLHC2, QLHC3, QLHC4, QLHC5). Additionally, 10 English teachers were questioned on the timing and method of correcting students' writing mistakes. The findings demonstrate that spelling, punctuation, grammar, and usage problems are the most frequent mistakes committed by participants. The findings of the teacher interviews suggest that all faults should be corrected by teachers. One of many new methods that teachers use can be group writing and various marking strategies for errors and stylistic variation. The paper ends with pedagogical recommendations.

References

Polio, C. (2003). Research on second language writing: An overview of what we investigate and how. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 35-65). Cambridge University Press.

Ferris, D., Pezone, S., Tade, C., & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 155-182.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90032-3

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.

Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second language skills: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Grass, S., & Selinker, L. (1994). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Brown, H. D. (1987). Principles of language learning and teaching (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.

Corder, S. P. (1999). The significance of learners’ errors. In Language acquisition and the second/foreign language classroom (pp. 102-113). Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. University of Michigan Press.

Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023

Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2001). Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 269-274.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120045230

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9

Downloads

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

Nguyễn Thị Trang, & Lê Phương Long. (2024). Teachers’ feedback on learners’ writing: The case of People’s Police College II. Journal of Science Lac Hong University, 2(16), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.61591/jslhu.16.374